Evolutionary Dynamics of Strategic Behavior in a Collective-Risk Dilemma

نویسندگان

  • Maria Abou Chakra
  • Arne Traulsen
چکیده

A collective-risk social dilemma arises when a group must cooperate to reach a common target in order to avoid the risk of collective loss while each individual is tempted to free-ride on the contributions of others. In contrast to the prisoners' dilemma or public goods games, the collective-risk dilemma encompasses the risk that all individuals lose everything. These characteristics have potential relevance for dangerous climate change and other risky social dilemmas. Cooperation is costly to the individual and it only benefits all individuals if the common target is reached. An individual thus invests without guarantee that the investment is worthwhile for anyone. If there are several subsequent stages of investment, it is not clear when individuals should contribute. For example, they could invest early, thereby signaling their willingness to cooperate in the future, constantly invest their fair share, or wait and compensate missing contributions. To investigate the strategic behavior in such situations, we have simulated the evolutionary dynamics of such collective-risk dilemmas in a finite population. Contributions depend individually on the stage of the game and on the sum of contributions made so far. Every individual takes part in many games and successful behaviors spread in the population. It turns out that constant contributors, such as constant fair sharers, quickly lose out against those who initially do not contribute, but compensate this in later stages of the game. In particular for high risks, such late contributors are favored.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Strategy with Novel Evolutionary Features for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma

In recent iterated prisoner's dilemma tournaments, the most successful strategies were those that had identification mechanisms. By playing a predetermined sequence of moves and learning from their opponents' responses, these strategies managed to identify their opponents. We believe that these identification mechanisms may be very useful in evolutionary games. In this paper one such strategy, ...

متن کامل

روش‌های مدل‌سازی تطوری در اقتصاد (با تاکید بر عناصر مشترک سازنده آنها)

In this paper we have tried mention to some sort of thewell-known evolutionary modeling approaches in economic territory such as Multi Agent simulations, Evolutionary Computation and Evolutionary Game Theory. As it has been mentioned in the paper, in recent years, the number of Evolutionary contributions applied to Multi-Agent models increased remarkably. However until now there is no consensus...

متن کامل

Kybernet Ik a — Ma Nuscr Ipt Collective Behavior and Kin Selection in Evo- Lutionary Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma

Some strategies can be evolutionarily stronger than others although no evolutionarily stable strategy exists in iterated prisoner’s dilemma if the long-term payoff for each player is not insignificant. Li and Kendall (2009) introduce a so-called collective strategy for evolutionary iterated prisoner’s dilemma which plays a sequence of predefined moves and then identifies the opponent according ...

متن کامل

Human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma experiments suppresses network reciprocity

During the last few years, much research has been devoted to strategic interactions on complex networks. In this context, the Prisoner's Dilemma has become a paradigmatic model, and it has been established that imitative evolutionary dynamics lead to very different outcomes depending on the details of the network. We here report that when one takes into account the real behavior of people obser...

متن کامل

Collective Evolutionary Dynamics and Spatial Reciprocity under the N-Person Snowdrift Game

The evolution of cooperation has been gathering increasing attention during the last decades. Most of the times, cooperative behavior involves more than two individuals, and the N-person Prisoner’s Dilemma, which is the most studied generalized social dilemma in this context, not always manages to capture those situations that often occur to humans. In such cases, the N-person Snowdrift Game (N...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012